Abstract:
If a man cannot afford a drug that would save his wife's life, can one really fault him for stealing the drug in order to let his wife live?
Simultaneously, can one fault the drug manufacturer for demanding an unaffordable price from this man if its business is based on creating prices that produce profits? What is more reasonable than blaming either of these two conflicting parties is considering a third party: the institution that allows money to control whether or not someone lives or dies....